When meeting people in the industry to talk about the political, policy and regulatory scenes one of the most frequent topics at the moment is the future of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Insurance & Financial Services. There seems to be an assumption on the part of some people that just because a few familiar faces will definitely not be there after the next General Election that the group will face a difficult time. I'm not sure I accept this assumption.
The group has always been one of the most active all party groups and this level of activity is set to be sustained as the financial services sector faces up to some significant regulatory and commercial challenges over the next few years. Certainly, this will all take place against the background of major political change with a General Election within the next year and possible reform of the House of Lords, both of which could significantly change the composition of the group.
The group will have to find a new chairman as John Greenway
announced two and a half years ago that he would not be re-standing following
the redistribution of his current seat in North Yorkshire (So, what did happen in Thirsk & Malton?). John has chaired the
group since 1992, when he succeeded the group's founder chairman Sir Robert
McCrindle. Similarly, joint secretary Sir John Butterfill announced sometime
ago that he was not seeking re-election. More recently, one of the other joint
secretaries, Labour MP Jim Cousins, decided to retire at the next election. All three have been tremendous supporters of the group and have helped ensure that there are MPs who have an understanding of the issues that affect the sector. They will be missed.
With 41 MPs and 26 peers currently members of the group, however,
they are far from the complete picture. There is significant interest in
Parliament in engaging with the insurance and retail financial services markets
and the fact that over half the members of the group have attended at least one
event so far in the current session helps underline that point. Just a glance
at the programme and the range of organisations that want to meet the group
demonstrates that there is similarly plenty of interest outside Parliament in
using the group as a vehicle for communicating with policymakers, the principal
purpose for which it was established in 1991.
I think the other factor people need to bear in mind is that
the APPG has always been run above board. It is not a cloak to disguise a
lobbying group like some specialist all party groups. It exists to provide a
channel of communication on issues that matter to the insurance and retail
financial services sector. We frequently arrange meetings on specific topics
for the group to which speakers with differing viewpoints are invited and,
sometimes, these will be consumer critics of the industry.
Nobody makes any money out of it. It is not sponsored. We
(by which I mean Incisive Media) do not take "membership fees" from outside
organisations like some all party groups. The only members are Members of
Parliament and most of its meetings are open to whoever wants to attend - even
rival publications to those owned by Incisive Media have been known to attend!
We provide the secretariat and administrative support,
website and newsletter free of charge. Why? Partially because we identified
this as a way we could put something back into the markets we serve and
partially because it helps keep us close to events that our markets are
interested in. For almost identical reasons PricewaterhouseCoopers provides the
technical support on the same basis, writing briefing papers and minutes of the
public sessions.
However transparent any new regime is and however
restrictive it is in allowing people to make money out of being connected to
Parliament, we are confident that this group will come through those tests. So,
for as long as Parliamentarians want to hear from the industry and the industry
wants to engage with them, the group should have a future.
It is already planning a busy autumn session which will be
kicked off by Post Magazine's annual Parliamentary reception, which started in
1989 and is now hosted in conjunction with its Business Leaders' Forum.
Posted by David Worsfold on June 15, 2009 3:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Previous Comments (1)
John Greenway will be a big loss. He has always shown a superb grasp of the issues facing insurance brokers and the wider industry. Maybe you could retain him as chairman if he gets a seat in the House of Lords after the election.
Posted by Howard Mason | June 16, 2009 2:54 PM
POST A COMMENT
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
John Greenway will be a big loss. He has always sh ...
Posted by Howard Mason